↓
 
Home→Microsoft Fabric→Microsoft Fabric reference architecture

Comments

Microsoft Fabric reference architecture — 5 Comments

  1. Pingback:A Reference Architecture for Microsoft Fabric – Curated SQL

  2. Pingback:When to Use a Warehouse, Fabric, Lakehouse, or Mesh – SQLServerCentral - KubPoint

  3. Hi James,

    I’ve followed your work since my early days as a SQL Server Admin, and I recently rediscovered your blog after many years. It’s still one of the highest-quality resources on data—thank you for continuing to share your insights.

    I really appreciated the architecture diagram you shared. Out of curiosity, have you ever considered animating it? I think it would make a great enhancement to your original reference architecture.

    Thanks again for all the value you bring to the data community!

    PS : how about to add “function” on the diagram close to StoredProc?

  4. The five-stage path reads well as a communication view. When teams use it as an architecture artifact, I find it helps to distinguish the physical movement of data from the logical transformations, and to mark where quality checks or reprocessing branches sit; otherwise one line can imply a straight-through path even when bronze-to-silver corrections loop. For teams preparing a review version, the diagram-design Web Playground can help sketch that view quickly. Disclosure: I’m commenting on behalf of EditorialDiagram.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

↑